On The Fly...
On the Fly…
A recent post encouraged me to focus more on the punchlines and less on the commentary. This week’s “On The Fly” will do exactly that.
Neo-Conservatives Strike Again
In the span of one week George W. Bush and his Neo-Conservatives proved once again how idiotic this administration is focusing on Steroid Abuse and the Terri Schiavo case in Florida.
I attempted to hit the ball out of the park last week regarding the steroid hearings, so let’s turn to the Schiavo case.
The whole situation is tragic for Terri, her family, and husband. But Terri Schiavo is America’s real “Million Dollar Baby”. The cost of this case in Florida, Medicare/Medicaid expenses, and now the cost to the taxpayer so that the Neo-Conservatives could use her in their political agenda are ridiculous.
Bush had no problem with executing mentally retarded criminals, but clearly this "red meat" guy now actually likes vegetables.
So it is full steam ahead and damn the Constitution.
Hopefully the voters will take this case of the “Million Dollar Baby” brought forth by Terri's family (The Schindlers) and form their own “Schindler’s List” voting nay, to all of those of both parties that voted yea early this morning.
Bill Frist Continues to Prove that One Does Not Have To Be An Intellect to Be a Doctor
The same guy who said that AIDS could be spread from sweat, even by handshakes now chimes in on his medical opinions regarding Terri Schiavo. This feedback comes from a Dr. who never has seen or provided a medical consultation for Terri Schiavo. Looks to the Bird like this guy is not only unethical in politics, but also medicine.
And this is the man many of the Neo-conservatives want to be their Presidential candidate in 2008?
Oh well as the Beatles said; “You say you want a revolution, well you know we all want to rule the world...”.
Speaking of Revolutions
One thing that the rest of the world has learned as we celebrate our second anniversary of the invasion of Iraq is that insurgencies work.
If we continue with these neo-conservative (the American Taliban) ideologies, perhaps we may need to consider starting our own passive-aggressive insurgency on the home front.
If only 5% of the U.S. population were to destroy a $1000 of government property per day over a 60-day period the tab would approach a trillion dollars. Our population is about 300 Million, you do the math. While I seriously do not endorse this idea, it would hit them where it hurts the hip pocket.
posted by The Bird Poop @ 11:14 AM
10 comments
10 Comments:
Another brilliant commentary from Mr. Poop. Tell me Mr. Poop, where is the governments wealth derived? It has one income source. The tax payer. We would be kicking ourselfs in the groin. Thats a trillion more dollars we the tax payers would have to come up with. I thought you were for the little guy? That would disolve any tax cut we all recieved. But hey, . . maybe we can get all of the wealthy americans to pay for by raising their taxes even further. By the way, there is nothing passive-aggressive about vandolism. It is aggressive. I'll leave you with one question. You said "So it is full steam ahead and damn the Constitution." Exactly which part of the Constitution was violated?
The hypothetical point I was making that a small percentage of the population can bankrupt the government. While big business and the Radical Religous Right own this administration, they politically must swing more back to the left.
Yes taxes should be increased on the upper 2%. Are we in a war? Why do we lower taxes? Does our Public Education System suck? Are our healthcare policies (lack of heathcare, medicaid/medicare)falling apart? America is off to a slow start in the global economy, and it needs leadership. The current administration elected to start a war rather than address real issues.
Well, you convienently side stepped my qustion once more. I asked, "Exactly which part of the Constitution was violated?" And you reply with religious right and big buisness. You're making these grandious statements as if you are on stage but when the rubber hits the road you have nothing. If you make a statement, . . I want facts. I have some news for you. You may not have heard but the USA is the most active and viverent economies in the world. We are the global economic leaders, . . next is the European Union (a COLLECTION of Euroean Countries) who by the way is struggling to keep up with us. Unemplyment averages in Europe around 12%. Currently here in the USA unemplyment is around 5.2%. Lower then the 5.6% President Clinton ran on for reelection. Politicly if this administration is swinging to the left then why are you not embracing them? The new perscription drug/medicare bill. You should be happy as a pig in mud. But on you complain. Education reform (No Child Left Behind)that bill was a compromise with the left was allowed to be written by Sen. Ted Kennidy. Social Security is being looked at. President Bush even asked (on several occasions) for imput from both sides of the politcal isle. All he is getting from the left is obstruction. No imput. It sounds to me that he is doing his job and addressing the "real issues" as you put it. Im amazed you dont or wont recognize this. Everything you have stated is incorrect. Im amazed how missinformed you are. You have bird poop coming out of both ends. You (the left) have had ample opportunity to be part of the solution but all you have really become is part of the problem. The american people see this and thats why you keep loosing elections. By the way, there is no lack of health care in this country. I work hard and pay my health care premium every month to my insurance company and guess what? I and my family have health care. Thats all it takes! Finally Im not going to justify you're comments on how we started this war with a responce (for now).
Once again I apoligize for my spelling as my typing skills are slower then my thought process.
Just for the record, Art. I, Sec. 9, Clause 3 of the constitution,
"No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed."
was violated. A bill of attainder is a law passed specifically for one person. Terri Schiavo was one person (barely), and thus the order was a bill of attainder.
Fatty.
Just for the record, Art. I, Sec. 9, Clause 3 of the constitution,
"No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed."
was violated. A bill of attainder is a law passed specifically for one person. Terri Schiavo was one person (barely), and thus the order was a bill of attainder.
Fatty.
So tell me which bill was passed that violated that article of the constitution?
Did you forget when Congress rushed in on a Sunday night to attempt to trump the Supreme Court ruling?
With all the issues our nation has a true conservative would have not have made the Neo-con arguement regarding Schiavo.
Separation of Powers, Separation of Church and State, and State Rights have always been key conservative points. But not under Bushy.
Congress's rush was due to the limited time. Remember someones life was in the balance. I know they debated the issue. But what bill was passed that violated the constitution?
Once again you have no examples.
Thats because no bill/Law was passed that violated anything.
You idiots seem to think it is a violation of the constitution when congress gathers to debate an issue. Thats what they are there for! You morons all gather around the latest Bush bashing talking points and like sheep start spouting off together about how the constitution was violated by the president (who is not congress) by the way. The fact is there was no violation of the constitution in this case. You all have got to realize how idiotic you all sound.
Post a Comment
<< Home